体育外交的实践逻辑:工具理性与资本再生产  

Practical Logic of Sports Diplomacy:Instrumental Rationality and Capital Reproduction

作　　者：王创业 张德胜[1] WANG Chuangye;ZHANG Desheng(School of Journalism and Communication,Wuhan Sports University,Wuhan 430079,Hubei,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉体育学院新闻传播学院,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《上海体育学院学报》2020年第5期47-54,62,共9页Journal of Shanghai University of Sport

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目(19ATY004);“楚天学子”计划资助项目。

摘　　要：体育外交作为独立研究对象得益于实践,但其实践缺乏系统性和统合性。以往研究者采用"例证法",强调体育外交的功能和政治目的,忽略了体育外交的实践逻辑。从韦伯的"工具理性"视角出发,重新整合体育外交的实践逻辑,同时引入社会学中的"资本"概念,提出"资源-行动战略-目的"的实践模型;认为应区分体育外交资源和体育外交行动,体育外交实践的政治目的是"资本生产与累积",经济、文化、社会和象征资本通过再生产的方式再次参与到体育外交实践中。以此模型为基础,进一步检视了中国体育外交实践中存在的部分问题。As an independent research object,sports diplomacy benefits from practice,but the practice of sports diplomacy lacks systematization and integration. In the past,researchers used "exemplification" to emphasize the function and political purpose of sports diplomacy but ignored the practical logic of sports diplomacy. The research starts from Max Weber’s "instrumental rationality" perspective,reintegrates the practical logic of sports diplomacy,and introduces the concept of "capital" in sociology,hence the practical mode of "Resources-Action Strategies-Aims" has been proposed. It believes that it is necessary to distinguish sports diplomatic resources from sports diplomatic actions. The political purpose of sports diplomatic practice is "capital production and accumulation";economic,cultural,social and symbolic capital once again participates in the practice of sports diplomacy through reproduction. Based on this model,this study further examines the problems existing in China’s sports diplomacy practice.

关 键 词：体育外交 实践逻辑 工具理性 资本 外交资源 外交行动 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]