检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁传琦 金静芬[1] DING Chuan-qi;JIN Jing-fen
机构地区:[1]浙江大学医学院附属第二医院护理部,杭州市310009
出 处:《中华护理教育》2020年第3期275-278,共4页Chinese Journal of Nursing Education
摘 要:目的 了解急诊科护士临终照护态度与死亡态度现状,探讨两者之间的关系.方法 采用便利抽样法,运用一般情况调查表、中文版照护临终患者态度量表和中文版死亡态度描绘量表对153名急诊科护士进行问卷调查.结果 急诊科护士临终照护态度总分为(79.78±10.03)分;死亡态度5个分量表均分由高到低依次为逃离接受(3.15±0.79)分、趋近接受(3.04±0.66)分、死亡恐惧(2.92±0.65)分、死亡逃避(2.88±0.72)分、自然接受(2.16±0.58)分.分层回归分析显示,自然接受、死亡逃避、逃离接受能够独立解释急诊科护士临终照护态度总变异的27.8%.结论 急诊科护士临终照护态度水平不高,死亡态度对其有影响.Objective To investigate the hospice care attitude and death attitude among emergency nurses and examine their relationship.Methods One hundred and fifty-three emergency nurses were recruited by convenience sampling and investigated by the Chinese version of Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale(FATCODS)and Death Attitude Profile-Revised(DAP-R)questionnaire.Results The total score of hospice care attitude was(79.78±10.03).The subscale scores of DAP-R in descending orders were(3.15±0.79)for escape acceptance,(3.04±0.66)for approach acceptance,(2.92±0.65)for fear of death,(2.88±0.72)for death avoidance,and(2.16±0.58)for natural acceptance respectively.The hierarchical regression model showed that natural acceptance,death avoidance,and escape acceptance could explain 27.8%variance of hospice care attitude among emergency nurses.Conclusion The overall level of emergency nurses'attitude of hospice care is not good and influenced by death attitude.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249