共享经济下网约工法律关系分析与制度回应--以及时送达众包平台为例  

Legal Relationship Analysis and Institutional Response of Online Contract Workers in the Sharing Economy--Taking Timely Delivery of Crowdsourcing Platform as an Example

作　　者：马欢军 Ma Huanjun

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学经济法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《贵州省党校学报》2020年第2期62-69,共8页Journal of Guizhou Provincial Party School

摘　　要：对网约工法律关系的分析应具体落实到平台、第三方劳务公司、实际需求方等主体。平台信息中介地位应当实质判断,引入第三方劳务公司有助于社会利益最大化。实际需求方订立运输合同,不应认定劳务关系。在制度供给不足情形下,司法认定标准不一,因而需要相关制度衔接以实现利益平衡。网约工权益应针对不同用工形态进行分类保护,主要对专职化的众包用工进行倾斜保护。众包平台与网约工的劳动关系应当推定排除,相关权益保护可以通过设立灵活用工工伤保险基金以及完善商业保险制度等配套措施进行强化。The analysis of network contract labor legal relationship should be specifically implemented to the platform,the third-party labor company,the actual demander and other subjects.The intermediary status of platform should be judged in essence and the introduction of third-party labor companies is conducive to the maximization of social benefits.When the actual demander enters into a transport contract,the labor relationship should not be recognized.In the case of insufficient system supply,judicial identification standards are different,so relevant systems need to be connected to achieve the balance of interests.The rights and interests of network contract workers should be classified and protected according to different employment patterns,and the professional crowdsourced labor should be protected in a preferential way.Crowdsourcing platforms should be presumed to exclude labor relations,and the protection of relevant rights and interests can be strengthened through the establishment of flexible employment injury insurance fund and the improvement of commercial insurance system.

关 键 词：共享经济 零工经济 网约工 劳动关系 劳务关系 

分 类 号：D922.5[政治法律—民商法学]