检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘叶深 Liu Yeshen
机构地区:[1]北方工业大学文法学院法律系
出 处:《东方法学》2020年第3期33-44,共12页Oriental Law
基 金:北京社科基金“中国权利的理论与实践”项目(项目批准号:17FXC033)的资助。
摘 要:既有权利主体路径的集体权利概念将集体权利等同于"集体的权利",无法说明集体权利的诸多重要特征及其作为一类权利的重要意义。权利内容路径的集体权利概念理论认为,累积善和参与善的提供、维系作为权利内容只能为集体所拥有,不宜为个人所拥有。这既说明了集体权利主体的复数特征,又深层地揭示出该权利的诸多重要特征。由此概念出发,至少存在两种类型的集体权利。以此集体权利概念为基础,三代权利学说中的新兴权利最好不要将其理解为权利的代际迭兴,而是理解为权利新理念的提出。The concept of collective rights in the right subject approach has equated collective rights with the rights of a collective, which cannot explain the importance of collective rights as a type of rights. The concept of collective rights in the right objects approach points out that as the objects of rights, cumulative kindness and the provision and maintenance of participatory kindness can only be owned by the collective and should not be owned by the individual. This establishes a concept of collective rights with clear boundaries and practical implications. With this concept, the three generations of human rights theory should not be understood as the intergenerational emergence of new rights, but should be understood as the new views of rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49