论行政机关协助执行行为的可诉性  

On the Litigability of Administrative Organ’s Assistance in Execution

作　　者：郑琳 Zheng Lin

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084

出　　处：《行政与法》2020年第4期92-100,共9页Administration and Law

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“法治中国建设背景下警察权研究”的阶段性成果,项目编号:15JZD010;清华大学自主科研计划文科专项项目“警察法学理论体系之重构”的阶段性成果,项目编号:2016THZWYX01。

摘　　要：行政机关协助执行行为认定为"司法协助行为+行政行为",可以在确保司法权威与提高执行效率的同时促进法治政府的建设,为当事人合法权益救济提供可能。《关于适用〈中华人民共和国行政诉讼法〉的解释》第一条第二款第七项但书前的规定,因为受司法权作用,是不具有可诉性的司法协助义务;但书后的规定,因为有行政机关独立自主的意思表示,是具有可诉性的行政行为。其中,但书中"扩大执行范围"包括执行范围内容、种类、期限的扩大,"采取违法方式"包括滥用职权、超越职权以及程序违法。"缩小执行范围""不作为""擅自撤销或变更"等协助执行违法行为需要通过类推适用的方式对条款的法律漏洞予以填补。The administrative organ’s assistance in execution is identified as "Judicial Assistance Act+administrative act",which can not only ensure the judicial authority and improve the efficiency of execution,but also promote the construction of the government under the rule of law,so as to provide the possibility for the legal rights and interests of the parties.To be specific,the provisions before the proviso of paragraph 7,paragraph 2,Article 1 of the interpretation on the application of the administrative procedure law of the People’s Republic of China are not actionable obligations of judicial assistance due to the role of judicial power;the provisions after the proviso are actionable administrative acts due to the expression of the will of the administrative organ to be independent and independent.Among them,the "expansion of the scope of implementation" in the proviso includes the expansion of the content,type and time limit of the scope of implementation,and the "adoption of illegal means" includes abuse of power,overstepping power and illegal procedures."Narrow the scope of enforcement","omission","revocation or change without authorization" and other illegal acts to assist in the enforcement need to be filled by analogy.

关 键 词：司法协助 行政行为 法治政府 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]