检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王杨 李莉洋[2] 尹禄 WANG Yang;LI Li-yang;YIN Lu(Concorde Shenzhen Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Shenzhen Nanshan Hospital),Guangdong Shenzhen 518000,China;Characteristic Section of Liaoning Armed Police Corps Hospital,Liaoning Shenyang 110034,China;Shenyang Branch Health Team,Liaoning Shenyang 110034,China)
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学协和深圳医院(深圳市南山医院),广东深圳518000 [2]武警辽宁总队医院特色二科,辽宁沈阳110034 [3]武警沈阳支队卫生队,辽宁沈阳110034
出 处:《临床医药文献电子杂志》2020年第28期8-9,共2页Electronic Journal of Clinical Medical Literature
摘 要:目的通过对比试验的方式来分析拔牙位点保存技术在口腔种植中的临床价值。方法选取50例我院接受口腔种植的患者,将其平均分为实验组(25例)与对照组(25例)。对照组采用常规操作植入种植牙;实验组采用拔牙点位保存技术来进行植入。结果实验组成功率高于对比组,实验组牙槽骨吸收量低于对照组,实验组的牙槽骨宽度与高度均优于对照组,以上四组数据均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用拔牙点位保存技术可以提升口腔种植手术的成功率。Objective To analyze the clinical value of tooth extraction site preservation technology in dental implants by means of comparative experiments.Methods 50 patients receiving oral implantation in our hospital were divided into experimental group(25 cases)and control group(25 cases).The control group was implanted with conventional operation,while the experimental group was implanted with extraction point preservation technology.Result The power of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group.The alveolar bone absorption of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group.The alveolar bone width and height of the experimental group were better than those of the control group.The data of the four groups had statistical significance(P<0.05).Conclusion The successful rate of dental implant surgery can be improved by using extraction point preservation technology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.226.0