善举抑或侵略:中美庚款兴学性质探析  

Benevolence or Aggression:An Analysis of Sino-US Boxer Indemnity Remission for Education

作　　者：谭备战 陈改革 TAN Beizhan;CHEN Gaige(College of Maxism, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou,Henan 450046,China)

机构地区：[1]河南中医药大学马克思主义学院,河南郑州450046

出　　处：《中州大学学报》2020年第2期79-83,共5页Journal of Zhongzhou University

基　　金：2020年度教育部人文社会科学研究专项任务项目“红色基因融入大学生日常思政教育工作研究”(20JDSZ3068);2019年度河南中医药大学思想政治理论课教育教学改革专项研究项目(2019SZJG01)。

摘　　要：中美庚款兴学对中国近代社会产生极大的影响,在中美关系史上也占有重要地位,但由于它是中国屈辱外交下产生的特殊衍生物,对庚款兴学的性质评价亦是众说纷纭。今从唯物史观的角度,在阅读相关档案文献的基础上,对中美庚款兴学开展的背景再分析,理清中美两方对待庚款兴学的态度以及启动庚款兴学策略时各方发挥的作用,强调庚款兴学实施过程中双方的地位和实施效果,说明中美庚款兴学是对庚子赔款的自我否定,既不宜将之完全斥为“侵略”,亦不能称颂为“善举”,而是时代的产物。Sino-US Boxer Indemnity Remission for Education has a great influence on Chinese modern society,and it occupies an important position in the history of Sino-US relations.However,it is a special derivative of China’s humiliating diplomacy,there are different opinions on the Boxer Indemnity Remission for Education.From the perspective of historical materialism,based onthe relevant documents,this paper analyzes the background of the Sino-US Boxer Indemnity Remission for Education,clarifies the attitudes of the two sidesand the role of each side in launching the strategy,emphasizes the status and effect of both sides in the implementation of the promotion,and explains that the promotion of Sino-US Boxer Indemnity Remission for Education is a self denial.It should not be called“aggression”or“good deeds”,but the product of the times and the necessity of history.

关 键 词：中美关系 辛丑条约 庚款兴学 性质 评价 

分 类 号：K712[历史地理—历史学]