偶然防卫既遂说--以学术论争与既遂说的合理性为视角  

Research on the Completion of Accidental Defense

作　　者：罗炜 LUO Wei(Guangxi University for Nationalities,Nanning 530000,China)

机构地区：[1]广西民族大学法学院,广西南宁530000

出　　处：《黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报》2020年第3期81-84,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering

摘　　要：当前我国对偶然防卫的学术观点较多,有偶然防卫无罪说、未遂说和既遂说,且这些学说对偶然防卫的刑法定性各不相同,有着各自的合理性,但也都存在一定的理论局限性。通过主客观相统一原则认定偶然防卫是犯罪既遂相比于结果无价值说和行为无价值说而言,不仅可以对偶然防卫进行准确的定性,体现其危害性,也能给予行为人合理的刑事处罚,实现罪责刑相适应,还可以实现刑罚打击犯罪与保护法益、一般预防与特殊预防相统一的目的。在主客观相统一原则下认定偶然防卫是犯罪既遂具有相对合理性。At present,there are many academic views on accidental defense in our country,including the theory of innocence,the theory of attempted defense and the theory of accomplished defense. These theories have different definitions of criminal law on accidental defense,and their own rationality,but they all have some theoretical limitations. According to the principle of subjective and objective unity,it can not only determine the nature of accidental defense accurately and reflect its harmfulness,but also give the perpetrator a reasonable criminal punishment,so as to realize the adaptation of criminal responsibility and punishment,and also achieve the goal of combining punishment against crime with protection of legal interests,general prevention and special prevention. Under the principle of the unity of subjective and objective,it is relatively reasonable to determine that accidental defense is the completion of a crime.

关 键 词：偶然防卫 学说争议 犯罪既遂 主客观相统一 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]