试论苏辛农村词的创作差异  

On Differences between Sushi’s and Xinqiji’s Country Poetry

作　　者：胡贤林 欧阳静 HU Xian-lin;OU YANG Jing(College of Culture and Communication,Xingyi Normal University of nationalities,Xingyi 562400,China;School of Humanities and Social Science,Anhui Agricultural University,Hefei 230036,China)

机构地区：[1]兴义民族师范学院文学与传媒学院,贵州兴义562400 [2]安徽农业大学人文社会科学学院,安徽合肥230036

出　　处：《广州广播电视大学学报》2020年第2期58-63,110,共7页Journal of Guangzhou Open University

基　　金：教育部人文社科基金项目“乾嘉汉学视域中的文论话语转向研究”(项目编号:16YJA751008);安徽农业大学2018年大学生创新训练项目“苏辛农村词创作的比较研究”。

摘　　要：苏轼和辛弃疾在豪放词的创作上颇有建树,在宋代词坛上声名显赫。苏辛对于宋代农村词的发展之功亦不容忽视。自苏轼将农村风物摄入词中,极大丰富了词的表现内容,辛弃疾更是在此基础上将农村词不断发扬光大。苏辛农村词的创作表现了共同的旨趣,但在表现形式的运用、表现手法的选择、自我情感的抒发方面都存在差异,究其原因,与二人所处的政治环境、思想性格和生存境遇密切关联。Su Shi and Xin Qiji had great achievements in the creation of bold and unrestrained Ci-poems, so they became famous in the Song dynasty. Their contribution to the development of rural Ci-poetry in the Song dynasty cannot be ignored. Since Su Shi incorporated rural folk customs into Ci-poetry, the content of the Ci-poetry was greatly enriched, and Xin Qiji innovated the Ci-poetry on this basis. Although there are many similarities in their creation of rural Ci-poems, there are obvious differences in their expression forms, expression methods, emotional expression and other aspects. The reasons lie in their different political environment, ideological character and survival situation.

关 键 词：苏轼 辛弃疾 农村词 

分 类 号：I207.23[文学—中国文学]