狷狂稚子与超灵之子--现代生态视阈下李贽与爱默生的诗学精神比较  

The Child of Pride and the Son of Oversoul

作　　者：杜璇 DU Xuan(School of Foreign Languages,Huainan Normal University,Huainan Anhui 232001)

机构地区：[1]淮南师范学院外国语学院,安徽淮南232001

出　　处：《长沙大学学报》2020年第3期117-122,共6页Journal of Changsha University

基　　金：淮南师范校级重点基金项目“美国诗人爱默生与安徽现当代诗人的关系研究”,编号.2019XJZD15;淮南师范学院博士基金项目“拉尔夫埃利森的阈限性研究”;安徽省高校人文社会科学研究重点项目“基于英文网站视角的安徽外向型企业外宣翻译研究”,编号:SK2019A0569;淮南师范学院重点教研项目“OBE理念和翻转课堂结合下的大学英语教学改革研究——以淮南师范学院为例”,编号:2019HSJY04。

摘　　要：李贽和爱默生出生、成长于不同的国度,但由于两国的社会背景、环境等因素具有相似之处,两者的诗学精神也存在着诸多相似之处,当然,也有不同之处。两者都向往、憧憬和歌颂大自然,但在人和自然的关系上,李贽诗中追求的是"天人合一"的融合之境,而爱默生推崇的是人是万物的主宰;在个性观上,两者都反对强权统治,主张人性解放、个性自由,但李贽注重今生、现世的享乐,而爱默生注重来世的回报和享乐;在世界起源上,李贽是唯物主义者,爱默生是具有坚定的宗教信仰的唯心主义者。Li Zhi and Emerson lived in different countries, but due to environmental factors such as the social background of the two countries, they shared much the same or differences in the poetic spirit. They both yearn for and eulogize nature, but on the relationship between people and nature, Li Zhi is in the pursuit of "nature and humanity are the one", while Emerson has advocated the man is the master of all things. In the view of human nature, both of them oppose tyranny’s powerful ruling and advocate human’s liberation and individual freedom. Li Zhi pays attention to the enjoyment in this present life, while Emerson pays attention to the return and enjoyment in the afterlife. In terms of philosophy, they both believe in the equality of all people, but in terms of the origin of the world, Li Zhi is a materialist and Emerson is an idealist with firm religious beliefs.

关 键 词：狷狂稚子 超灵之子 现代生态学 诗学精神 

分 类 号：B21[哲学宗教—中国哲学]