检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李秀仙[1] Li Xiuxian(Tianjin University of Commerce,Tianjin 300134)
出 处:《职业技术教育》2019年第33期53-58,共6页Vocational and Technical Education
基 金:天津市教委科研计划项目“高等教育第三方评估可靠性模型的构建与应用研究”(2018SK090),主持人:李秀仙。
摘 要:从评价学的角度看,我国高职排名在理论上存在排名本身存在内在矛盾、指导思想或模糊或虚设、评价内容不清三个问题,在技术上存在指标设计违背同层次指标相互独立原则和可比性原则等问题。进一步讨论表明,如果不改进排名方法,高职排名本身根本就没有存在的必要。需要对现有排名方法加以改进,切实体现高职排名存在的价值。From the perspective of evaluation,the rankings of higher vocational colleges in China have three theoretical problems,such as the rankings themselves have inherent contradictions,the guiding ideology is vague or imaginary,and the evaluation content is unclear.Technically,the index design violates the principle that indicators at the same level should be independent of each other and the principle that indicators should be comparable.Further discussion shows that if the ranking method is not improved,there is no need for the ranking of higher vocational colleges to exist.It is necessary for the ranking organization to make a slight improvement on the ranking method,so as to embody the value of ranking of higher vocational colleges.
分 类 号:G718.5[文化科学—职业技术教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.109.3