检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董蕊 芦婷 胡桥龙 DONG Rui;LU Ting;HU Qiaolong(College of Business Administration,Zhejiang University of Finance&Economics,Hangzhou 310018)
出 处:《心理研究》2020年第2期112-120,共9页Psychological Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“信号检测视角下的日常道德判断研究”(16CZX062)。
摘 要:本研究探索了在日常道德冲突中,道德倾向和道德决策之间的关系及其可能的理论边界。通过对443名大学生进行道德观点量表、不道德决策量表和道德注意量表的问卷调查,结果发现:功利主义和不道德决策正相关,形式主义与不道德决策负相关。反思性道德注意在形式主义和不道德决策间起调节作用。具体来讲,反思性道德注意低时,形式主义与不道德决策无关;反思性道德注意高时,形式主义越高,个体越可能做出不道德决策。研究结论:形式主义可以为个体提供正确的决策方向,但不能保证个体做出道德决策。道德注意和形式主义共同塑造个体的道德行为。In the current study,we explored the relationship between ethical predispositions and moral decision-making in daily moral conflicts,and its possible theoretical boundaries.We asked 443 undergraduate students to complete questionnaires.The results showed utilitarianism had a significant positive impact on unethical decision.Formalism had a significant negative impact on unethical decision.Reflectiveness moral attentiveness played a moderation effect on the relationship between formalism and unethical decision.Specifically,when reflective moral attention was low,there was no correlation between and unethical decision-making;when reflective moral attention was high,the higher the formalism,the more likely the individual was to make unethical decision.Therefore,the study implies that formalism can provide the right direction for individual,but it cannot guarantee individual to make ethical decision.Moral attentiveness and moral predispositions jointly shape individual moral behavior.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49