检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张曙[1] ZHANG Shu(Zhejiang University of Technology)
机构地区:[1]浙江工业大学法学院
出 处:《法学家》2020年第3期114-125,194,195,共14页The Jurist
基 金:国家社科基金项目“刑事诉讼管辖的模式选择与规范重建研究”(13CFX051)研究成果。
摘 要:作为刑事诉讼管辖权运行的非常态现象,管辖错误既破坏了管辖秩序,亦侵犯了被追诉人的法定管辖权利。我国现行的管辖错误审查机制主要以解决司法机关自身管辖权为目的指向,以程序补救为功能依归,忽视了管辖权作为程序合法性要件的波及效力。管辖权的审查机制应当从"单一性"转向"复合性",并通过"明显错误"规则,对管辖错误情形下的程序效力作出合理判定。应当在区分管辖类别、案件性质及其所处的诉讼阶段之基础上,对管辖错误的后续程序处理作出不同的规范建构。As an abnormal phenomenon in the operation of criminal procedure jurisdiction,jurisdictional errors not only destroy the order of jurisdiction,but also infringe on the legal jurisdiction rights of the accused. The current review mechanism of jurisdictional errors in our country mainly aims at solving the jurisdiction of judicial organs themselves,regards procedural remedy as its functional basis,and neglects the effect of jurisdiction as an important element of procedural legitimacy. The review mechanism of jurisdiction should change from"singleness"to"complexity",and make a reasonable judgment on the procedural effectiveness in the case of jurisdictional errors through the rule of "obvious errors". On the basis of distinguishing the category of jurisdiction,the nature of the case and the stage of litigation,different normative constructions should be made to deal with the follow-up procedure of jurisdictional errors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.85.79