批评话语分析与修辞批评:异同与互补  

Critical Discourse and Rhetorical Criticism: Difference, Similarities and Complementation

作　　者：宋平锋[1,2] 李雯 SONG Ping-feng;LI Wen(School of Foreign Languages,Nanchang Institute of Technology,Nanchang Jiangxi 330099,China;School of Foreign Languages,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China;Department of Basic Courses,Jiangxi Technical College of Manufacturing,Nanchang Jiangxi 330099,China)

机构地区：[1]南昌工程学院外国语学院,江西南昌330099 [2]上海大学外国语学院,上海200444 [3]江西制造职业技术学院基础部,江西南昌330099

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第5期113-118,共6页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

基　　金：江西省高校人文社会科学研究2019年度一般项目(YY19109)。

摘　　要：作为来自不同领域的两类流行的话语分析方法,批评话语分析和修辞批评有着诸多的差异,如对"批评"内涵的理解、对读者或受众的关注度、理论来源、研究目的和分析模式等;但是二者在研究对象、对语境或修辞情境和话语背后动机的关注、语言哲学观等方面却存在许多共同点。批评话语分析与修辞批评各有自己的优缺点,两者可以优势互补,并已呈现出融合的趋势。在当今多元复杂的社会历史文化语境下,需要构建一种复合的修辞+批评话语分析模式(R&CDA),以便应对当今社会出现的各种复杂话语。As two approaches of discourse analysis from different disciplines, critical discourse analysis and rhetorical criticism have such differences as connotations towards "critical", focus on readers or audience, theoretical origin, purpose, analytical model, etc. Meanwhile, they also have many similarities, such as research object and focus on context or rhetorical situation, implied motivation, philosophical views of language, etc. With their respective advantages and disadvantages, they can complement with each other. Actually, there has been a trend of merging with each other. It’s believed that a new comprehensive Rhetorical & Critical Discourse Analysis(R&CDA) needs to be established to meet the different discourses in today’s multi-complex social and historical context.

关 键 词：批评话语分析 修辞批评 差异 共同点 互补 

分 类 号：H05[语言文字—语言学]