检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐玮[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏大学,江苏镇江212000
出 处:《考试与评价》2020年第2期26-32,共7页TESTING AND EVALUATION
摘 要:本研究基于自建语料库,对比分析了不同学科国际期刊英文摘要中作者身份构建的异同,发现在学术论文写作中,作者主要构建研究者和话语构建的身份,而较少构建评价者的身份;无论是研究者、语篇构建者还是观点持有者在软科学中的使用频次显著高于硬科学,对此我们认为这是由于硬科学与软科学之间的学科差异和各个学科约定俗成的摘要写作规范在起作用。本研究结果旨在为学术论文写作和外语教材的编写提供一定的参考。Based on the self-built corpus,this study compares and analyzes the similarities and differences in the construction of the authorial identity in the English abstracts of international journals in different disciplines.It is found that in academic paper writing,the author mainly constructs the identities of researcher and discourse constructor,but seldom constructs the identity of evaluator.The identities of researcher,discourse constructor and arguer have significantly higher frequency of use in soft science than those in hard science,which is due to the disciplinary differences between hard science and soft science and the conventional abstract writing norms in each discipline.The results of this study are intended to provide some references for the writing of academic paper and the compilation of foreign language teaching materials.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3