检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜彦薇 DU Yan-wei(Anhui University,Hefei 230601,China)
出 处:《哈尔滨学院学报》2020年第6期53-56,共4页Journal of Harbin University
摘 要:随着庭审实质化和认罪认罚从宽制度在我国的开展,保障犯罪嫌疑人诉讼权利成为了诉讼模式改革的重中之重。2012年刑诉法将委托诉讼代理人的时间扩大到侦查阶段,但从属于辩护权的律师在场权却没有得到确立。律师在场权的存在有着极高的现实意义,但在我国却面临着相当大的困境。可以考虑在确定适用范围的情况下,对侦查人员的告知义务及在场律师权利义务作出说明,完善相关制度,以期在未来侦查阶段中引入律师在场权,全方位保障被追诉者的各项权利。With the substantiation of court trial and the leniency of confession and punishment system in China,the protection of criminal suspects’litigation rights has become the most important part of the reform of litigation mode.In 2012,the criminal procedure law extended the time of entrusting agent ad item to the stage of investigation,but the lawyer’s right to be present,which is subordinate to the right of defense,has not been established.The existence of lawyer’s right to be present has a very high practical significance,but it is facing a considerable dilemma in China.In the case of determining the scope of application,it can be considered to explain the informing obligation of investigators and the rights and obligations of on-site lawyers,improve the relevant system,in order to introduce the lawyer’s on-site right in the future investigation stage,and comprehensively protect the rights of the prosecuted.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249