生态、族群、神秘叙事及其他——厄德里克与郭雪波生态文本族群话语探微  

Ecology,Ethnic Group,Mysterious Narrative and Other: An Analysis of the Ethnic Discourse in the Ecological Texts by Louise Erdrich and Guo Xuebo

作　　者：纪秀明[1] JI Xiuming

机构地区：[1]大连外国语大学科研处,辽宁大连116044

出　　处：《外语与外语教学》2020年第2期132-139,F0003,共9页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

基　　金：2019年国家社科基金“西方生态批评的马克思主义中国化阐释与重构研究”(项目编号:19BWW009)部分研究成果。

摘　　要：本文拟从地方区域观、国族与族群意识、神秘叙事等层面发掘两位作家生态书写的差异性,探讨厄德里克与郭雪波生态文本话语的特殊性与复杂性。指出,厄德里克的生态书写具有深厚的族裔文化情愫,且不断超越种族与地理之疆界,走向形而上生态自我的探索。郭雪波较为纯粹的生态批评向度,体现了对民族现代化生存的焦灼与批判,他以鲜明的国家民族认同感与使命感,凌驾了对少数族裔命运的个性化体验。就修辞审美而言,厄德里克以神话及其改写重申对族裔身份关注的同时,开放性的改写与后现代技巧加权了审美张力。郭雪波的神话叙事以祛魅化强调叙事的意识形态功能的同时,则缓释了美学刚性。From the perspectives of local regional view,national and ethnic awareness,and mysterious narrative,this paper intends to reveal the differences in two writers’ eco-writings and explore the particularity and the complexity in ethnic discourses of the ecological texts by Erdrich and Guo Xuebo. The analysis shows that Erdrich’s eco-writing has a deep ethnic emotion and keeps breaking through the boundaries between race and geography,and finally goes to the self exploration of the metaphysical ecology;whereas Guo Xuebo’s pure ecological criticism dimension reflects the anxiety and criticism to the survival of national modernization. With the distinct senses of ethnic identity and national mission,Guo Xuebo dominates the individualized experience of the fate of ethnic minorities. As far as rhetoric aesthetic is concerned,Erdrich restates his concern to ethnic identities via mythology and its rewriting and simultaneously,his open rewriting style and postmodern skills strengthen the aesthetic tension. Guo Xuebo’s dismystifying mythological narrative not only emphasizes the ideological function,but also intensifies the aesthetic quality.

关 键 词：郭雪波 厄德里克 族群话语 生态书写 神秘叙事 

分 类 号：I06[文学—文学理论]