检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:武晓艺[1] WU Xiaoyi(Law School,Peking University,Beijing 100871,P.R.China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871
出 处:《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第3期111-121,共11页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“刑事诉讼法实施问题与对策研究”(15YJA820003)。
摘 要:我国死刑复核程序中法律援助缺位、辩护权行使难度大、辩护意见不受重视、法律规定粗疏且操作性差等,亟待加以完善。以刑事辩护法律援助全覆盖为契机完善死刑复核程序,主要路径在于建构我国死刑复核程序强制辩护制度,加快强制辩护的法律修订,以明确违反程序的法律后果、裁判文书说理的要求、律师执业权利的保障、异议权利的行使等事项,并提供相关可操作性诉讼规则指引。In the death penalty review procedure in China,the lack of legal aid,the difficulty of exercising the right to defend,the lack of attention to defense opinions,the lack of legal regulations and the poor operability are urgently needed to be improved. Taking the full coverage of criminal defense legal aid as an opportunity to improve the death penalty review procedure,the main path is to construct a mandatory defense system for the death penalty review procedure in China and speed up the legal revision of mandatory defense,to clarify the legal consequences of procedure violation,the requirements of reasoning in judicial documents,the protection of lawyer’s practice right,the exercise of opposition rights and other matters,and provide guidance on relevant operational litigation rules.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.228.200