检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宗楠[1] ZONG Nan(School of Economics and Management,Changchun Finance College,Changchun 130028,China)
机构地区:[1]长春金融高等专科学校经济管理学院,吉林长春130028
出 处:《长春金融高等专科学校学报》2020年第3期39-44,共6页Journal of Changchun Finance College
基 金:吉林省教育厅“十三五”社会科学项目(JJKH20181083SK)。
摘 要:近年来,互联网金融交易领域内违约、侵权纠纷频发,互联网金融消费纠纷的解决机制成为大众关注的热点。审视当前制度构架,在完善现有金融纠纷解决机制的基础上构建互联网金融交易申诉专员(FOS)制度和金融交易在线纠纷解决机制(ODR),进而形成“多元化”互联网金融纠纷解决体系,多方并行,才能确保互联网金融消费者维权渠道通畅,以促进互联网金融行业的健康、稳定发展。In recent years,there are many disputes about breach of contract and infringement in the field of Internet financial transactions.The resolution mechanism of Internet financial consumption disputes has become a hot topic of public concern.To examine the current institutional framework,build the Internet financial transaction Ombudsman(FOS)system and online financial transaction dispute resolution mechanism(ODR)on the basis of improving the existing financial dispute resolution mechanism,and then form a"diversified"Internet financial dispute resolution system,in which multiple parties are parallel,so as to ensure the smooth channels for Internet financial consumers to safeguard their rights and promote the Internet financial industry’s healthy and stable development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249