多元价值观和风险的可接受性  

Multi-cultural Values and the Acceptance of Risks

作　　者：薛亚利[1] Xue Yali

机构地区：[1]上海社会科学院社会学研究所,上海200020

出　　处：《社会科学》2020年第5期82-91,共10页Journal of Social Sciences

摘　　要：无论是追求避免社会风险,还是追求绝对安全,都是不符合现实的虚幻想法,而真正的审慎态度则是对风险进行深度理解,去辨析多元文化价值观对风险接受度的影响,只有这样才能将社会风险过滤为可接受的。从受众角度来理解风险的可塑性及受众的风险接受能力,就要辨别和区分影响风险接受度的文化价值观类型。针对社会风险,民众往往呈现出四种价值观类型:"等级主义"、"平等主义"、"个体主义"和"宿命论"。调和不同文化价值观的风险化解机制,可以分为"风险补偿机制"、"风险平衡机制"、"风险叙述机制"和"风险意义机制"。在现代社会,多种新旧风险交织频发,因此须有相应精准的风险化解机制,只有因风险具有可接受性才能最终将其化解,从而维持社会的长治久安。The pursuit of avoiding social risks,or the pursuit of absolute safety,is the illusory idea beyond of reality.The prudent attitude is to analyze the impact of multi-cultural values on risk acceptance in depth,so as to filter social risks into acceptable ones.On the basis of four types of values,i.e."authoritarianism","egalitarianism","individualism"and"fatalism",this paper puts forward four corresponding resolution mechanisms of risk,namely,"risk compensation mechanism","risk balance mechanism","risk narrative mechanism"and"risk significance mechanism".In modern society,as long as risks are transformed into accepted ones,risks can be truly relieved.In modern society,old and new risks interweave and occur frequently,so there must be a corresponding risk-resolution-mechanism to it.Only in this way can risks be transformed into accepted ones,and long-term social stability can be maintained.

关 键 词：风险的可接受性 多元文化价值观 风险化解机制 

分 类 号：C912.6[经济管理]