背离立法预期的举证时限制度:实践及修正  

Time Limit of Proof and Its Deviation from the Legislative Expectation:Practice and Modification

作　　者：孟醒 王一涵 MENG Xing;WANG Yi-han(School of Law,Liaoning University,Shenyang 110036,China;School of Law,City University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong 999077,China)

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学法学院,辽宁沈阳110036 [2]香港城市大学法学院,中国香港999077

出　　处：《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第3期12-22,共11页Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：《民事诉讼法》和民事诉讼法司法解释对我国逾期举证规范制度进行全面改革,预期以构成要件的阶梯式适用发挥对拖延诉讼的层次化制裁效果。然而该制度在实践运行中普遍遭到法院对其构成要件和法律后果的搁置、规避、改装、误用,从而背离了立法预期。逾期举证规范制度的偏差运作主要根源于忽略促进诉讼的价值,以及结果导向司法理念下的程序性裁判规则的缺失。为规范逾期举证规定的适用,同时引导实务界关注和接受促进诉讼理念,需以提高逾期举证规范制度的司法地位为出发点,立法上应明文引入“促进诉讼原则”和逾期举证规范制度的“导致诉讼迟延要件”,强化促进诉讼价值和逾期举证规范制度对该价值的维护;司法上则应发布指导性案例,提高法院对逾期举证规范制度的重视程度并规范法院的适用。The Civil Procedure Law and its interpretation have made a comprehensive reform for Chinese late evidence submission system,expecting to apply the constitutive component mechanism progressively and produce a hierarchical sanction effect.Such system,however,fails to gain a positive practical response due to that the courts tend to ignore,evade,modify or misuse the constitutive components and legal effects of the system,reflecting the contradiction between the practice and the legislative expectation.The dysfunction of the system is the result of the ignorance of the value of facilitating the proceeding and the lack of procedural adjudication rules under the result-oriented judicial idea.To regulate the application of the late evidence submission system and lead the courts to feature and accept the procedural value of facilitating litigation,the importance of the system should be highlighted by adding“the principle of facilitating proceeding”into the Civil Procedure Law and adding a new constitutive component——“causing delay of the proceeding”——to the late evidence submission system.To raise the courts’attention on correctly applying the system,a guiding case should be issued in reference to the demonstration case provided in this article.

关 键 词：逾期举证 举证时限 司法实务 促进诉讼 实体公正 

分 类 号：D195.2[政治法律—政治学]