人工智能“电子人”侵权责任能力的法律展开  

LEGAL EXPANSION OF THE CAPACITY FOR TORT LIABILITY OF THE“ELECTRONIC PERSON”WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

作　　者：郭少飞[1] 李天宇 GUO Shao-fei;LI Tian-yu(Law School,Henan Normal University,Xinxiang 453000,China)

机构地区：[1]河南师范大学法学院,河南新乡453000

出　　处：《南阳理工学院学报》2020年第1期37-40,共4页Journal of Nanyang Institute of Technology

基　　金：2018年河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2018BFX012)。

摘　　要：人工智能“电子人”侵权责任能力在侵权法上表现为“电子人”侵权责任,对该责任的把握与认定,对于“电子人”侵权损害具有重要意义。人工智能“电子人”侵权责任应实行无过错责任或严格责任,其阻却事由除不可抗力以外,尚有受害人对损害之发生存在故意、第三方有过错且是唯一可归责方、“电子人”沦为工具等情形。“电子人”侵权责任系自己责任,由电子人自主负责,在赔偿方面遵循“个体责任为主、社会化措施为辅”的原则。“电子人”侵权案件事实查明与一般侵权案件无异,加害行为及损害后果由原告方举证,实行推定因果关系,被告方可举证因果关系不存在而免责。The identification of artificial intelligence“electronic person”infringement liability is significant in the damage of the“electronic person”tort.The tort liability of the“electronic person”with artificial intelligence is the objective responsibility of implementing no fault or strict liability.Except for force majeure,there are three situations in which the“electronic person”has intentional damage,the third party is at fault and is the only attributable party,and the“electronic person”becomes a tool.“Electronic person”tort liability is its own responsibility,and the electronic person is responsible for it.It follows the principle of the“individual responsibility primary,social measures supplemented”in compensation.The factual investigation of the“electronic person”tort case is no different from the general tort case.The infringement and the consequences of the damage shall be proved by the plaintiff,and the rule of presumed causality shall be implemented.

关 键 词：人工智能 电子人 严格责任 免责事由 推定因果关系 

分 类 号：K05[历史地理—历史学]