检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张永安 马彩娟[2] 刘立博 张明乾 包可翔 Zhang Yong’an;Ma Caijuan;Liu Libo;Zhang Mingqian;Bao Kexiang(China Tobacco Fujian Industrial Co.,Ltd.,Xiamen 361012,Fujian,China;Xuchang Branch of Henan Provincial Tobacco Company,Xuchang 461000,Henan,China)
机构地区:[1]福建中烟工业有限责任公司,福建厦门361012 [2]河南省烟草公司许昌市公司,河南许昌461000
出 处:《农学学报》2020年第4期48-52,共5页Journal of Agriculture
基 金:福建中烟工业有限责任公司科技项目“‘七匹狼’品牌基地标样质量评价体系研究及应用”(FJZYKJJH2016004)。
摘 要:为探讨2种赋分制烤烟外观质量数字化评价方法与感官质量是否相关,选用3个产地中部正组相邻4个等级烟叶进行数字化打分及相关分析。结果表明,2种外观质量评价方法均能有效区分不同等级烤烟外观质量,但2种方法对部分外观质量指标敏感度差异明显。方法一(10分制)对外观质量的识别灵敏度较高且与感官质量呈极显著相关。方法二(100分制)在部分近相邻等级外观质量识别中易于出现较大误差,且未能反映出颜色显著差异。To explore whether two digital evaluation methods of appearance quality with scoring system was related to sensory quality of flue-cured tobacco,four main grades of middle tobacco leaves of three producing areas were selected for digital scoring and correlation analysis.The results showed that the two methods could effectively distinguish the appearance quality of different grades of flue-cured tobacco.But the sensitivity of the two methods to certain appearance quality indexes was significantly different.Method 1(10 point system)had a high sensitivity for the recognition of appearance quality and was significantly correlated with sensory quality.Method 2(100 point system)was prone to large errors in the recognition of appearance quality of certain adjacent grades,and failed to reflect the significant differences in color.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30