检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李尧君 温丽萍 Li Yaojun;Wen Liping(Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang Jiangxi 330013,China)
出 处:《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2020年第3期1-11,共11页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
基 金:2019年江西省南昌市法学会“法治南昌智库”重点项目“法律职业共同体的探索与实践”的阶段性研究成果.
摘 要:法律职业共同体的存在是法治国家赖以存续的基础,建立独立且自治、成熟并强大的法律职业共同体是法治社会建成的必经之路。现阶段,我国法律职业共同体虽已初步形成,但距离理想法治状态下的法律职业共同体还存在差距。实践中,我国法律职业共同体建设中存在公安机关参与不足、职业交流机制不健全、缺乏统一的法律职业培训及改革措施可实践性不足等问题。对此,亟需加强法律职业共同体的顶层设计;明确法律职业共同体的成员范围;完善法律职业共同的培育体系和一体化培训机制;加快法律职业共同体的交流平台及反馈机制建设。The existence of the legal professional community is the basis for the existence of a country ruled by law.The establishment of an independent,autonomous,mature and powerful legal professional community is the only way to build a society ruled by law.At this stage,although China’s legal professional community has taken shape,there is still a gap between the legal professional community under the ideal state of law.In practice,there are problems such as insufficient participation of public security personnel,inadequate professional communication mechanism,lack of unified legal vocational training and inadequate practicality of reform measures in the construction of the legal professional community in China.It is urgent to strengthen the top-level design of the legal professional community and clarify the scope of membership of the legal professional community,improve the common cultivation system and integrated training mechanism of the legal profession,and increase the construction of the communication platform and feedback mechanism of the legal professional community.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.223.70