司马迁生平若干问题的再思考  

Some Different Views About Sima Qian

作　　者：吴长城[1] 刘得腾 WU Chang-cheng;LIU De-teng(School of Architectural Engineering,Xinyang Vocational and Technical College,Xinyang 464000,China;Weinan City Intangible Cultural Heritage Protection Center,Weinan 714000,China)

机构地区：[1]信阳职业技术学院建筑工程学院,河南信阳464000 [2]渭南市非物质文化遗产保护中心,陕西渭南714000

出　　处：《信阳农林学院学报》2020年第2期70-73,共4页Journal of Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University

摘　　要：对司马迁生年的主证史料可信度进行考辨,得出两种说法的司马迁生年均缺乏有力证据;借助汉代法制史研究成果对武帝时宫刑及赎刑进行分析,得出“自请宫刑”当为“赎为宫刑”;根据西汉官员及有爵者卒年的记载规律,得出司马迁当为正常死亡,补证了王国维“其卒年绝不可考”的结论。This paper examined the credibility of the principal evidence of Sima Qian's birth year,then concluded that there is no strong evidence for the two arguments.Based on the research results of the legal history of Han Dynasty,this paper analyzed the castration and redemption of Emperor Wudi,and concluded that the"self-invited castration"should be"redemption to castration".According to the records of the death years of officials and nobles in the Western Han Dynasty,it is concluded that Sima Qian died normally,and provided Wang Guowei’s conclusion that his death year should not be examined.

关 键 词：司马迁 生年 宫刑 卒年 

分 类 号：K234.1[历史地理—历史学]