人工智能文学的诠释困境及其出路  

The Dilemma of Interpreting Artificial IntelligenceLiterature and Its Ways Out

作　　者：王泽庆[1] 孟凡萧 WANG Zeqing;MENG Fanxiao(College of Liberal Arts,Anhui University,Hefei,Anhui,230039;不详)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学文学院,安徽合肥230039

出　　处：《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第3期58-66,共9页Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“中国网络文学评价体系建构研究”(18ZDA283)。

摘　　要：创作热度不减,而作品接受依然冷清,是当前人工智能文学存在的重要问题。社会关注人工智能文学创作的整体现象,而没有深入诠释具体作品。诠释视域的不饱和,人工智能的经验缺失,导致人工智能文学的诠释断裂。人工智能文学的诠释困境,也折射出它的创作困境。人工智能通过学习人类的作品,在总结规则的基础上进行创作,但美的艺术本质上是“天才”的产物,按照已有规则进行创作,其创新性是有限的。人工智能研究应该有所为,有所不为。从虚构写作转向作为广义非虚构写作的网络文学批评,在某种程度上可以缓解人工智能文学的困境,并有助于解决当前网络文学批评不足与网络文学作品数量急剧增长之间的矛盾。The enthusiasm for creation is rising while the reception remains poor,which is a dilemma for the current artificial intelligence literature.The society pays attention to the overall creationof artificial intelligence literature,while the readers cannot thoroughly interpret the works.The unsaturation of the interpretive horizonand the lack of artificial intelligence experience have led to interruptions in the interpretation of artificial intelligence literature.The interpretation dilemma of artificial intelligence literature also reflects its creative dilemma.Artificial intelligence works are created by studying human works and summing up the rules perceived.The art of beauty is essentially a product of“genius”,so the creativity of artificial intelligence is limited.Artificial intelligence research should be selective in what to achieve.The transition from fiction writing to network literary criticism as generalized non-fiction writing can overcome the dilemma of artificial intelligence literature to some extent,and help resolve the contradiction between the shortage of network literary criticism and the rapid increase in the number of network literature.

关 键 词：人工智能文学 微软小冰 网络文学批评 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]