财产保全责任险保险费承担机制研究  

Research on the Mechanism of Cost-sharing in Property Preservation Liability Insurance

作　　者：刘君博[1] Liu Junbo

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处：《法学杂志》2020年第6期89-99,共11页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：司法部国家法治与法学理论项目“解决执行难视角下财产保全制度研究”(项目编号:18SFB3020)的研究成果

摘　　要：司法实践中对财产保全责任险保费诉请存在完全不支持、全部支持以及部分支持等三种迥然不同的裁判结果。由于缺少充分的说理和论证,最高人民法院的裁判立场并未获得广泛接受。在既有的诉讼成本转付模式中,基于知识产权诉讼特殊性发展而来的合理费用请求权模式可以类推适用于保全保险费请求,以解决请求权基础不明确的问题。同时,结合适用要件事实分配的"规范说",申请保全人应对财产保全裁定生效和费用支出的权利发生事实承担主张和证明责任,被保全人则可以提出权利妨碍和减免抗辩。There are three kinds of verdicts as for the claims of property preservation liability insurance expenses,overruled,supported and supported partially.The opinion of Supreme People’s Court is not accepted widely because of its poor argument and inadequate demonstration.The rules of right of reasonable expenses which was developed in intellectual property litigation can analogize in the insurance expenses,and therefore the lack of legal basis can be overcome.At the same time,the applicant should claim and take the burden of proof of right elements,while the respondent can bring forward the obstructive and exempt facts of right defense according to the normative theory.

关 键 词：财产保全 诉讼费用 财产保全责任险 保全保险费 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学] D922.284[政治法律—法学] D923