检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:侯银萍[1] 陈定良[2] 张峰[2] Hou Yin-ping;Chen Ying-liang;Zhang Feng
机构地区:[1]浙江工业大学法学院 [2]嘉兴市人民检察院
出 处:《苏州大学学报(法学版)》2020年第2期78-86,共9页Journal of Soochow University:Law Edition
摘 要:检察行政公益诉讼制度拓展了检察机关的法律监督职能,已经成为当代我国检察制度的重要特色之一。作为检察行政公益诉讼必经的前置性程序,诉前程序是实现检察机关办案质效的最佳路径,体现了检察机关"双赢多赢共赢"的司法理念。司法实践中,诉前程序尚面临着调查核实难、检察建议刚性不足、行政机关履职判断缺乏规范等问题,既需要理论层面的探讨,也需要实践层面的探索,这些问题的检视与完善是提升检察行政公益诉讼制度实效性和规范性的迫切需要。The public interest litigation system initiated by the procuratorate has become one of the important characteristics of contemporary procuratorial system in China.The pre-trial procedure is the best way to realise the quality and efficiency of handling cases as the prepositive and necessary procedure.It embodies the judicial philosophy of the“win-win,multi-win and common-win”.In judicial practice,there are still many problems in the pre-trial procedure,such as the difficulty of investigation and verification,the lack of rigidity regarding inspecting suggestion,and the lack of standard judgment on the administrative organs.These problems require theoretical and practical exploration.The inspection and improvement of these problems is in urgent need to improve the effectiveness and standardisation of the public interest litigation system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104