中国城市发展战略规划转型--结合汕头城市发展战略规划的探讨  

TRANSFORMATION OF CHINA’S URBAN STRATEGIC PLANNING:A CASE STUDY OF SHANTOU STRATEGIC PLAN

作　　者：陈昭 王红扬[2] CHEN Zhao;WANG Hongyang

机构地区：[1]南京大学城市规划设计研究院 [2]南京大学建筑与城市规划学院

出　　处：《城市规划》2020年第5期9-18,共10页City Planning Review

摘　　要：中国的城市发展战略规划始于2000年并迅速繁荣,实质非正式地成为规划体系中位于总体规划之前的顶层设计。随着宏观转型和国土空间规划时代的到来,战略规划也亟待理论和方法的更新。借用库恩“范式”概念,本文首先尝试总结改革开放前30年我国现代化和城市化特征(定义为现代化1.0),及其影响下产生的战略规划范式。进而,结合汕头——一个与现代化1.0战略规划范式相冲突的“反常”案例的实证,分析了宏观新常态下现代化和城市化的可能特征(定义为现代化2.0),及与之相适应的新型战略规划的实践。最后,通过深入实践范式转型背后的理论范式转型,提出基于科学整体观和整体主义方法论的新型战略规划,对国土空间规划承担好自身的时代使命具有关键作用。Since born in 2000,China’s urban strategic development planning has quickly grown into prosperity and taken the role of top-level design prior to master planning in planning system.But the current transformation of the macro-context is urging a renewal of the theory and methodology for the strategic planning.Taking the theory of paradigm shift by Thomas Kuhn as the explanation framework,this paper firstly reviews the previous paradigm of China’s modernization and urbanization(defined herein as Modernization 1.0)and the urban strategic planning paradigm in the 2000s that conforms to the macro-context then.Then with reference to the characters of the emerging economic new normal and new era(defined herein as Modernization 2.0),this paper takes Shantou,where the development has long been conflicting with the Modernization 1.0 paradigm,as an example to explain the new strategic planning paradigm supporting the new macrocontext.Finally,an investigation into the theoretical paradigm shift behind the practical paradigmshift,the paper concludes that new strategic planning based on a scientific philosophy of Holism and holistic methodology will be critical for the newly launched Territorial Spatial Planning to successfullyundertake its historical responsibilities.

关 键 词：战略规划 整体主义 范式 

分 类 号：F299.21[经济管理—国民经济]