认罪认罚从宽制度下值班律师程序参与模式研究--在诉讼公正与诉讼效率间平衡  

On Duty Lawyers’Participation Mode in the System of Leniency in Confession and Punishment---a Balance between Litigative Justice and Efficiency

作　　者：李作 LI Zuo(College of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2020年第2期33-41,95,共10页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：以诉讼权利、参与程度、责任轻重为指标对域外值班律师和我国值班律师、辩护律师制度进行考察,可以将域外值班律师程序参与方式归为弱参与模式、我国辩护律师归为强参与模式,而作为借鉴域外经验衍生出的本土化产品的值班律师,由于被赋予了法律帮助和辩护双重职能,其程序参与模式逐渐演变成区别于域外值班律师和辩护律师之外的第三种模式。在诉讼效率为主导的认罪认罚从宽制度实施背景下,基于寻求诉讼公正和诉讼效率动态平衡的角度,应当将我国值班律师程序参与模式界定为审前程序辩护律师化、庭审程序监督人化,并且在速裁程序、简易程序、普通程序中角色可以转换的模式。在此模式下建构一套与该模式相匹配、畅通值班律师参与认罪认罚案件的程序,发挥值班律师有效辩护和程序推动的双重功能。With the right of litigation,degree of participation and responsibility as indicators to examine the duty lawyers and defense lawyers both abroad and in China,we can classify the participation of foreign duty lawyers as a weak mode and that of our defense lawyers as a strong one.Duty lawyers in China,however,as an identity based on localized extraterritorial experience,has gradually developed a third mode with their dual functions of legal help and defense.With the efficiency-based system of leniency in confession and punishment,and for a dynamic balance between the litigative justice and efficiency,duty lawyers should participate as defense lawyers in the pre-trial process,and as supervisors in the trial procedure,and their role should be convertible between quick judging procedure,summary procedure,and normal procedure.A set of procedures should be established to make it easy for duty lawyers to participate in the cases,and to promote their dual functions of effective defense and procedure advancement.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽 值班律师 模式 程序参与 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]