检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏东[1] Wei Dong(Law School of Sichuan University,Chengdu 610225)
出 处:《政法论丛》2020年第3期107-120,共14页Journal of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家重点研发计划“高质高效的审判支撑关键技术及装备研究”(2018YFC0830300)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:人工智能犯罪的实质内涵是人工智能算法安全犯罪,其保护法益是作为公共安全的人工智能"算法安全"。人工智能算法安全犯罪的规范刑法学研究应当采取贯通当下视角和将来视角的第三种视角,努力实现"算法安全犯罪"规范一体的立法论建构和解释论建构的融合,将人工智能犯罪的保护法益类型化、犯罪行为类型化、归责类型化研究作为重要学术使命,推动人工智能犯罪领域的刑法立法完善和规范刑法学理论创新。The essence of artificial intelligence(AI) crime is AI algorithm security crime. Meanwhile, the legal interest of AI crime is public safety, which is known as AI "algorithm security". The research on normative criminal jurisprudence of AI algorithm security crime should adopt a third perspective that interconnects both current and future perspectives, which strive to achieve the normative integration of the legislative and hermeneutic construction of "algorithm security crime". The typification of legal interests, criminal behavior and attribution on AI crime is an important academic cause, which promotes the legislative improvement of criminal law in the field of AI and the innovation on theories of normative criminal jurisprudence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.40.61