不“格义”,怎么办?  

If Not“Ge-yi”,What Should We Do?

作　　者：何玉国 HE Yu-guo(School of Marxism, Tianjin University of Finance and economics, Tianjin 300222)

机构地区：[1]天津财经大学马克思主义学院,天津300222

出　　处：《江南大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2020年第3期85-93,共9页Journal of Jiangnan University：Humanities & Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：天津市2016年度哲学社会科学规划项目“后现代视野下老子文本书写研究”(TJZW16-005)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：佛教东传,为了“得意”“格义”盛行。但作为异质文化之间交流的必要手段,“格义”以中国旧有观念类比西学的释义方式,并未绝迹。21世纪,随着学术现代化观念的不断觉醒,作为“格义”的衍生范畴,“反向格义”(“逆格义”)成为主导,这种以西学观念框定、摆置中国学术的做法,在21世纪初,受到了学界广泛探讨。“不‘格义’,我们该怎么办?”也成了呼之欲出的问题,追本溯源,总结得失,提出“格义”“反向格义”依然有存在必要,辅助“合本”观念,倡导“问题意识比较”,应该成为“后格义”时代比较研究的新方向。Buddhism spread to the east for the purpose of“gratification”,but leading to the prevailing of“Ge-yi”(analogical interpretation).However,as a necessary means for the communication between heterogeneous cultures,“Ge-yi”has not disappeared in the way of interpreting Western studies with Chinese traditional ideas.In the 21st century,with the increasingly awakening of the concept of academic modernization,as a derivative category of“Ge-yi”,“Fan-xiang Ge-yi”(reverse analogical interpretation)became the dominant practice.At the beginning of the 21st century,this practice of framing and placing Chinese academic ideas in the concept of Western learning was widely discussed by the academic community.The question of“What should we do if we do not'Ge-yi'?”has also been raised.Tracing the source,summing up the gains and losses,proposing the needs for“Ge-yi”and“Fan-xiang Ge-yi”,assisting the concept of“harmony”and advocating comparison of problem consciousness should be a new direction of comparative study in the era of“Post-Ge-yi”.

关 键 词：格义 “反向格义” 合本 

分 类 号：B80[哲学宗教—思维科学]