检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于婷 李彦康 李奉祥 王金之 王玮 徐敏 张英杰 李建彬 Yu Ting;Li Yankang;Li Fengxiang;Wang Jinzhi;Wang Wei;Xu Min;Zhang Yingjie;Li Jianbin(Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy,Tianjin′s Clinical Research Center for Cancer,Tianjin 300070,China;Cheeloo College of Medicine,Shandong University,Ji′nan 250012,China;Department of Radiation Oncology,Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute(Shandong Cancer Hospital),Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences,Ji′nan 250117,China)
机构地区:[1]天津医科大学肿瘤医院与国家肿瘤临床研究中心,天津市肿瘤防治重点实验室,天津市恶性肿瘤临床医学研究中心,300070 [2]山东大学齐鲁医学院,济南250012 [3]山东省肿瘤防治研究院(山东省肿瘤医院),山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院)放疗科,济南250117
出 处:《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》2020年第6期432-436,共5页Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基 金:国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0904700);国家自然基金青年基金(81703038);山东省重点研发计划项目(2017GSF18102);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2017PH006)。
摘 要:目的比较基于不同体位定位CT下不同勾画者勾画保乳术后部分乳腺外照射(EB-PBI)靶区差异。方法2016-2017年间27例保乳术后拟行EB-PBI的患者在自由呼吸状态下序贯完成俯卧位及仰卧位模拟定位3DCT扫描。5位勾画者分别在两种不同体位CT图像上基于术腔金属夹完成瘤床(TB)靶区勾画和临床靶区(CTV)的构建。比较两种体位不同勾画者间的靶体积、变异系数(COV)、匹配指数(MD)差异。结果无论仰卧位还是俯卧位时,不同勾画者所勾画TB、CTV均不同(P<0.001、P=0.001、P<0.001、P=0.001)。俯卧位时不同勾画者CTV交集比仰卧位大5.79cm3(P=0.011)。仰卧位时5位勾画者的COVCTV显著大于俯卧位(P=0.014)。仰卧位时5位勾画者的MDTBTB及MDTBCTV均显著劣于俯卧位(P<0.001、P=0.001)。结论与仰卧位相比,基于俯卧位构建EB-PBI靶区可显著减少不同勾画者间差异,提高勾画者间的一致性。因此,在自由呼吸状态下基于俯卧位施行EB-PBI更为合理。Objective To explore the interobserver variabilities in the delineation of the target volume using simulation three-dimensional computed tomography(3DCT)between the supine and prone positions for external-beam partial breast irradiation(EB-PBI)after breast-conserving surgery(BCS).Methods Twenty-seven breast cancer patients who were scheduled to receive EB-PBI after BCS from July 2016 to April 2017 were enrolled in this study.All patients underwent axial 3DCT simulation scanning in the supine and prone positions during free breathing.Based on two different simulation 3DCT acquired,the gross target volume(TB)formed by using surgical clips and the clinical target volume(CTV)were delineated by five radiologists using specific guidelines.The following parameters including the target volume,coefficient of variations(COV)and matching degree(MD)were calculated to analyze the interobserver variability.Twenty-seven breast cancer patients who were scheduled to receive EB-PBI after BCS from July 2016 to April 2017 were enrolled in this study.Results Whether in the supine or prone position,the interobserver variabilities for TB and CTV were statistically significant(P<0.001,P=0.001,P<0.001,P=0.001).And the intersection of CTV in the prone position was 5.79 cm3 greater than that in the supine position(P=0.011).The interobserver variability of COVCTV in the prone positionwas significantly lower than that in the supine position(P=0.014).And the interobserver variabilities of MDTBTB and MDTBCTV in the prone positionwere statistically greater than those in the supine position,respectively(P<0.001,P=0.001).Conclusions When delineating the target volume of EB-PBI in the prone position,the interobsever variability can be reduced compared with that in the supine position.Hence,it is more reasonable to carry out EB-PBI in the prone position in free breathing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117