检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹广山 马丹[1] 李凤花[2] 马广辉[3] 王森林 Cao Guangshan;Ma Dan;Li Fenghua;Ma Guanghui;Wang Senlin(China Unicom Shandong Branch,Jinan 250001,China;Shandong P&T Planning and Designing Institute Co.,Ltd.,Jinan 250003,China;China Information Technology Designing&Consulting Insti⁃tute Co.,Ltd.Zhengzhou Branch,Zhengzhou 450007,China;Ericsson(CHINA)Communications Co.,Ltd.,Jinan 250011,China)
机构地区:[1]中国联通山东分公司,山东济南250001 [2]山东省邮电规划设计院有限公司,山东济南250003 [3]中讯邮电咨询设计院有限公司郑州分公司,河南郑州450007 [4]爱立信(中国)通信有限公司,山东济南250011
出 处:《邮电设计技术》2020年第6期6-10,共5页Designing Techniques of Posts and Telecommunications
摘 要:如何合理高效地利用频谱资源是目前运营商考虑的首要问题。目前2.1和3.5GHz频段是5G网络部署的主流频段,从链路预算和实地测试2个方面对2.1和3.5 GHz的覆盖性能进行了对比,详细分析了该频段在覆盖性能、业务承载上的差异,论证了3.5 GHz频段独立组网的缺陷及2.1 GHz频段重耕对后续组网效率的提升,并结合山东联通现网情况提出了对应的建设策略,为后续5G网络建设提供重要依据。How to use the spectrum resources reasonably and efficiently is the primary problem that operators consider at present.Now,the 2.1 and 3.5 GHz frequency bands are the mainstream frequency bands of 5G network deployment.It compares the coverage performance of 2.1 and 3.5 GHz from the two aspects of link budget and field test,analyzes their differences in coverage performance and service load,demonstrates the defects of independent networking in 3.5 GHz frequency band and the improvement of subsequent networking efficiency by 2.1 GHz frequency band refarming.Combined with the current network situation of Shandong Unicom,the corresponding construction strategy is put forward.It provides important basis for the subsequent 5G network construction.
分 类 号:TN929.5[电子电信—通信与信息系统]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.79