检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶青云 TAO Qing-yun(Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University,Sichuan chengdu 610081,China)
出 处:《临床医药文献电子杂志》2020年第40期10-11,共2页Electronic Journal of Clinical Medical Literature
摘 要:目的研究高频电切手术治疗消化道息肉的治疗效果,并与传统手术方法进行比较,观察并发症的发生率。方法将我院收治的68例患有消化道息肉的患者平均分成观察组和对照组,对照组患者接受传统的开腹手术治疗,观察组的患者接受内镜下高频电切治疗,然后分别评价两种手术方法对患者消化道息肉的治疗效果和并发症情况,进行统计分析。结果高频电切治疗的患者治疗效果的有效率、手术时间、术中出血量以及住院时间上明显低于传统手术方法治疗的对照组(P<0.05),术后并发症的发生情况也显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论高频电切的方法治疗消化道息肉效果好,并发症低,有效减轻患者疼痛和负担,是一种比较理想的治疗消化道息肉的外科治疗方法。Objective To study the therapeutic effect of high-frequency electric resection for digestive tract polyps,and compare it with traditional surgical methods to observe the incidence of complications.Methods 68 patients with digestive polyps admitted to our hospital were divided into observation group and control group.The control group received traditional laparotomy.The patients in the observation group underwent endoscopic highfrequency resection and then respectively The therapeutic effects and complications of the two surgical methods on the patients with digestive tract polyps were evaluated and statistically analyzed.Results The effective rate of treatment,operative time,intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization time were significantly lower than those of traditional surgical methods(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications was also significant.Lower than the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The high-frequency electric cutting method is effective for the treatment of digestive tract polyps,with low complications and effective relief of pain and burden.It is an ideal surgical treatment for digestive tract polyps.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31