论客观的超过要素的合理性——以“丢失枪支不报罪”为例  

On the Rationality of Objectively Exceeding Elements——Taking"the crime of not reporting the loss of firearms"As an Example

作　　者：贾巧巧 Jia Qiaoqiao(Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550005,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州师范大学法学院,贵阳550005

出　　处：《柳州职业技术学院学报》2020年第3期52-55,共4页Journal of Liuzhou Vocational & Technical College

摘　　要：在我国刑法理论界,一直比较主流且通说的学说是严格责任原则,即在一个罪名的成立过程中,主观罪过上要么是故意,要么是过失。但在我国刑事司法实践中,有一部分罪名的主观罪过形式并不能精准的去界定是故意还是过失,比如丢失枪支不报罪。从理论的适用程度,以及在不违背刑法基本原则的前提下对此进行探讨。In the theoretical circle of criminal law in China,the mainstream and general doctrine is the principle of strict liability,that is,in the process of establishing a crime,the subjective fault is either intentional or negligent.However,in our criminal judicial practice,the subjective guilty form of some charges can not be accurately defined as intentional or negligent,such as the crime of not reporting the loss of firearms.In view of this situation,many scholars in China have put forward their own opinions and opinions.However,Professor Zhang Mingkai's objective exceeding factor is a more reasonable theory from the application of the theory and on the premise that it does not violate the basic principles of criminal law.

关 键 词：主观罪过 客观的超过要素 合理性 

分 类 号：D914.399[政治法律—刑法学]