检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:童瑾[1] 黄磊[1] 李军[1] 曹春莉 杜婷婷[1] TONG Jin;HUANG Lei;LI Jun;CAO Chunli;DU Tingting(Department of Ultrasound,First Affiliated Hospital,School of Medicine,Shihezi University,Shihezi 832008,China)
机构地区:[1]石河子大学医学院第一附属医院超声科,新疆石河子832008
出 处:《中国医学影像技术》2020年第6期828-833,共6页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基 金:兵团科技攻关项目(2019DB012);博士基金项目(BS201802)。
摘 要:目的探讨声触诊组织量化成像(VTIQ)联合超声造影(CEUS)鉴别诊断TI-RADS 4类甲状腺良恶性结节的价值。方法对经手术切除及术后病理证实的86例TI-RADS 4类甲状腺结节患者的98个结节(以45个良性结节为良性组,53个恶性结节为恶性组)于术前行VTIQ及CEUS检查,获取结节剪切波速度最大值(SWV max)、最小值(SWV min)、平均值(SWV mean)、病灶最大值与周围正常组织的比值(SWV ratio)及CEUS特征,建立VTIQ联合CEUS的Logistic回归模型;以AUC比较VTIQ、CEUS及二者联合回归模型对TI-RADS 4类良恶性甲状腺结节的鉴别诊断效能。结果恶性组SWV max、SWV min、SWV mean、SWV ratio值均高于良性组(P均<0.05)。CEUS强化程度、强化均匀度、强化方式、环状增强、消退方式组间差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。SWV mean(>2.96 m/s)、强化程度(低增强)是诊断TI-RADS 4类恶性甲状腺结节的重要指标(P均<0.05)。SWV mean、CEUS及Logistic回归模型诊断TI-RADS 4类甲状腺良恶性结节的AUC分别为0.862、0.835和0.933。结论VTIQ及CEUS均可鉴别TI-RADS 4类甲状腺良恶性结节,二者联合可明显提高诊断效能。Objective To explore the value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification(VTIQ)combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant TI-RADS 4 thyroid nodules.Methods Totally 86 patients underwent surgical operation and were pathologically diagnosed were selected,including 45 benign(benign group)and 53 malignant(malignant group)TI-RADS 4 thyroid nodules.VTIQ and CEUS were performed before operation,and the maximal shear wave velocity(SWV max),minimum shear wave velocity(SWV min),mean shear wave velocity(SWV mean)as well as the ratio of lesion SWV max to the surrounding normal tissue shear wave velocity(SWV ratio)and CEUS characteristics were obtained and recorded.Then Logistic regression model of VTIQ combined with CEUS was established,the diagnostic effectiveness of VTIQ,CEUS and the combination of VTIQ and CEUS regression models of benign and malignant TI-RADS 4 thyroid nodules were compared using area under the curve(AUC).Results SWV max,SWV min,SWV mean and SWV ratio in malignant group were all higher than those in benign group(all P<0.05).For CEUS,the enhancement degree,enhancement uniformity,enhancement mode,ring enhancement and regression mode were all significantly different between groups(all P<0.05).SWV mean>2.96 m/s and low enhancement were important indexes for malignant nodules(P<0.05).AUC of SWV mean,CEUS and Logistic regression model were 0.862,0.835 and 0.933,respectively.Conclusion VTIQ and CEUS have good differential diagnostic ability for benign and malignant TI-RADS 4 thyroid nodules.Combination of VTIQ and CEUS can significantly improve the diagnostic effectiveness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200