检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:申屠春春[1] 杨仙菊 SHENTU Chunchun;YANG Xianju(Hangzhou College of Commerce,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310000,China)
出 处:《合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第3期92-96,共5页Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:浙江省外文学会专题研究项目(ZWYB2019024)。
摘 要:从语用论辩理论的修辞拓展层面发现问题,将西方修辞情境理论与策略操控有机结合,尝试进一步补充和深化语用论辩修辞维度的分析框架。为验证该分析框架的可行性,随后选取福克斯新闻网的一则报道作为个案研究,从修辞实效性和论辩合理性两个维度对其进行剖析,结果显示:报道者基于对修辞情境三要素的分析,在报道中巧妙地选取了出发点,并通过各种"同一"策略和艺术性理据取得修辞实效性;然而在论证过程中,报道者违背了自由规则和相关规则,因此在合理性方面存在严重不足。个案研究证明,融入修辞情境的语用论辩分析框架更有利于各类隐藏的修辞策略的识别,从而为判断策略操控的正当性提供了更充足的理论支持。This paper probes into the rhetorical extension of the Pragma-dialectics theory and uncovers its insufficiency,based on which,the analytical framework of the rhetorical effectiveness is improved by incorporating rhetorical situation into strategic maneuvering.To test the feasibility of the improved framework,a report by Fox News is taken as a case study.By analyzing it from the perspectives of rhetorical effectiveness and argumentative reasonableness,this paper finds that the reporter draws on the three constituents of rhetorical situation to realize her rhetorical aims,resorting to rhetorical means such as skillfully selecting the starting point,adopting various identification strategies and artistic proofs;and that she violates the Freedom Rule and the Relevance Rule in the critical discussion,failing to achieve argumentative reasonableness.As the case study shows,the analytical framework of Pragma-dialectics incorporated with rhetorical situation facilitates the recognition of some inconspicuous rhetorical strategies,which helps strengthen the evaluation of strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourses.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70