检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:相丽玲[1] 陈梦婕[1] XIANG Liling;CHEN Mengjie(School of Economics and Management,Shanxi University,Taiyuan 030006)
出 处:《档案学研究》2020年第3期67-74,共8页Archives Science Study
摘 要:对当前中外政府数据开放平台的运行方式及保障机制的实证对比研究,有助于我国政府数据开放的建设与发展。本文以各国D ata.Gov平台数据为基础,运用实证分析法、统计分析法、比较分析法,从政府数据开放平台的数据层、平台层、管理层3个层面,分析各国政府数据开放的整合与利用机制、开放与协作机制及管理与评估机制的现状。从中得出我国应借鉴国外先进技术与管理经验,加快完成各省、市试点工作,早日建成基于CKAN的国家级Data.gov专业平台建设。An empirical comparative study of the current operation mode and guarantee mechanism of Chinese and foreign government data open platforms will contribute to the construction and development of government data opening in China.Based on the Data.Gov platforms of various countries,using empirical analysis,statistical analysis,and comparative analysis,this paper analyzes the status of the integration and utilization mechanism,opening and collaboration mechanism,and management and evaluation mechanism of government data opening from the data layer,platform layer and management layer of government open data platform.It is concluded that China should learn from foreign advanced technology and management experience,speed up the completion of the pilot work in various provinces and cities,and build a national-level Data.gov professional platform based on CKAN as soon as possible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.85