检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘超 郑忱阳 Chao Liu;Chenyang Zheng
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学国际经济贸易学院
出 处:《国际税收》2020年第6期66-73,共8页International Taxation In China
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目“国有企业分类改革的理论逻辑与实施路径研究”(16AJY010)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:本文在"企业竞拍战"模型中引入中央政府因素,将其拓展为一国国内FDI税收竞争模型,以分析地方政府引资竞争的福利影响和中央政府的最优调控政策。本文模型分析表明:当地方引资竞争不存在时,中央政府没有动机采取差异化的调控政策;当地方引资竞争存在时,中央政府能够通过制定非对称税收政策抑制可能发生的"逐底竞争",从而使国家福利达到最大。若将区际公平纳入考虑,中央政府通过设计纵向配套转移支付机制,可提高竞争双方的福利水平,降低地方引资竞争导致的福利损失。This paper introduces the central government factor into the H-W model and expands it into domestic FDI tax competition model of one country, so as to analyze welfare impact of local government investment invitation competition and optimal policy of central government. The theoretical model shows that central government has no incentive to apply differentiated regulation policies when local competition for investment invitation does not exist. However, as the competition arising, the asymmetric tax policies formulated by the central government can suppress the possible "race to the bottom" so as to maximize national welfare. If taking inter-regional equity into consideration, the central government can increase the welfare level of both competitors and reduce the welfare loss by designing a vertical supporting transfer payment mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158