检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗康智[1] LUO Kang-zhi(Institute of Nationalities,Kaili University,Kaili 556011,Guizhou,China)
出 处:《黔南民族师范学院学报》2020年第3期39-45,共7页Journal of Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities
基 金:国家社科基金项目“明清时期土司制度与民族地区社会治理研究”(16BM2021)阶段性成果。
摘 要:学界对土司制度进行研究的著述颇丰,但在搜集、整理前人的相关研究成果时,却发现对这一制度的认识存在着诸多的偏颇。针对这些偏颇,从土司制度中的职官体制、土流并治、施法举措、健全与完善以及因俗而治推行该制度的生态背景等诸多方面,去重新审视相关史实,希冀有助于深化对该制度的认识。There are a lot of works about the chieftain system,but when collecting and sorting out the previous research results,we find that there are many biases in the understanding of this system. In view of these biases,it is necessary to re-examine the relevant historical facts from many aspects,such as the official system in the chieftain system,the combination of local government and local government,law enforcement measures,improvement and improvement,as well as the ecological background of the implementation of the system due to customs,which will help deepen the understanding of the system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145