民事审判庭审实质化问题研究  

Study on the Substantive Trail in Civil Jurisdiction

作　　者：张济坤 Zhang Jikun

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学国际法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《法学杂志》2020年第7期114-120,共7页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：推动庭审实质化是司法改革的重要任务之一。从民事审判实践出发,当前的庭审模式在结构、内容、功能和理念方面存在的法庭调查与法庭辩论割裂、程序法与实体法的割裂、事实纠纷解决和法定权利保护的割裂、诉讼权利和诉讼理念的割裂等制约庭审实质化的问题。在比较目前具有代表性的庭审改良模式基础上,应当坚持当事人主导的庭审中心主义,建立争点对抗制的庭审模式,以"独立的诉答程序--强制的争点整理程序--开放的争点对抗程序--总结性的最后陈述"作为具体推进庭审实质化的程序设计。To promote the substantive trial is one of the important tasks of judicial reform.Based on civil trial practice,this paper found that the current trial mode exist the following problems in terms of structure,content,function and concepts,including the segmentation of court investigation and court debate,procedural law and substantive law,factual dispute resolution and legal rights protection,litigation rights and litigation concepts,etc.,which restrict the substantive trial.By comparing the representative of the improved trial modes,this paper puts forward that we should adhere to the idea of the centralism of the trial with the parties in the leading position,establish the adversarial trial mode centering on the controversial focus,with the"independent procedure for statement by the plaintiff and defense by the defendant-the compulsory procedure for determining the focus of disputes-the open procedure for debating on the controversial focus-the sunmmative final statement"as a specific process to promote the substantive trial.

关 键 词：民事审判 庭审实质化 庭审模式 争点对抗制 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]