明末“天主”的源流及其比较文化学考察  

The Origin of the Concept“Tianzhu”(Lord of Heaven)in late Ming:A Perspective of Comparative Culturology

作　　者：纪建勋[1,2] JI Jian-xun

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学都市文化中心,上海200234 [2]上海师范大学人文学院,上海200234

出　　处：《北京行政学院学报》2020年第4期120-128,共9页Journal of Beijing administration institute

基　　金：上海市浦江人才计划资助项目(17PJC080)。

摘　　要：具有华夏文化本根意义的"天"概念,在明末与天主教的"Deus"相逢,致使"上帝"与"神"等传统文化关键词汇的蕴涵发生了变化。从观念史的角度考察,当中国传统语言、思想与文化里的"天主"与"Deus"相遇,"天主"含义的嬗变,以及明末"天主"概念在儒道佛耶四教中的种种使用,表明基督教神"Deus"对汉语"天主"一词原有蕴涵的"更新",在本质上实为一种"移植""借用"后的再"改造",而非新的"创造"。The connotations of key words in traditional Chinese culture such as“shangdi”(high sovereign)and“shen”(deity)had changed after the encounter between the concept“tian”(heaven),being of fundamental significance to Chinese culture,and the Catholic concept“Deus”in late Ming.From the perspective of the history of ideas,the encounter between“tianzhu”and“Deus”in traditional Chinese language in late Ming,and the meaning of“tianzhu”evolution,as well as the various uses of the concept“tianzhu”in Confucianism,Daoism,Buddhism,and Christianity in late Ming,show that the“renewal”of the original connotation of the term“tianzhu”through the Christian“Deus”is essentially a“reconstruction”by“transplanting”and“borrowing”,rather than a new“creation”.

关 键 词：天主 Deus 汉语神学 基督教中国化 

分 类 号：K248[历史地理—历史学]