检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘晓强[1] 刘明月 杨洋[1] 樊聪[1] 谭建国[1] Liu Xiaoqiang;Liu Mingyue;Yang Yang;Fan Cong;Tan Jianguo(Department of Prosthodontics,Peking University Hospital of Stomatology&National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases&National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology&Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology,Beijing 100081,China;Special Clinic Department of the First Clinical Division,Peking University Hospital of Stomatology,Beijing 100081,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学口腔医院修复科国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,100081 [2]北京大学口腔医院第一门诊部特诊科,100081
出 处:《中华医学教育杂志》2020年第1期43-46,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Education
基 金:中国学位与研究生教育学会资助项目(A1-YX20180304-01);北京大学口腔医学院教学改革项目(2017-PT-01)。
摘 要:目的:评价分步教学方式应用于口腔医学专业贴面牙体预备操作技能培训中的效果。方法:采用实验对照方法。2018年8月从全国7省、直辖市招募40名拟学习贴面牙体预备的口腔医师(以下简称学员)作为研究对象。将40名学员随机分为试验组和对照组,每组20人。在进行贴面牙体预备操作培训时,试验组采用分步教学方式,将教学内容(即贴面牙体预备)划分为4个阶段:切端预备、唇面预备、邻面扩展和精修磨光,每个阶段由教师理论授课、教师操作演示和学员操作练习3个部分组成。对照组采用整体教学方式,将教学内容划分为3个阶段:教师理论授课、教师操作演示和学员操作练习,每个阶段依次完成。教学结束后,由两组学员和两组教师分别评估教学效果,并由第三方专家评估两组学员的牙体预备质量。结果:两组学员对分步教学方式和整体教学方式的评分分别为(4.35±0.67)分和(3.40±0.75)分;教师的评分分别为(4.67±0.58)分和(3.33±0.58)分;专家对两组学员预备体质量的评分分别为(7.93±1.03)分和(6.60±1.29)分;其差异均具有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。 结论:分步教学方式可以提高贴面牙体预备操作技能培训的教学效果,师生对该教学方式的喜好度更高。Objective To assess the outcome of the step-by-step teaching method in dental skill training of veneer preparation.Methods Forty dentists,who want to learn the veneer preparation technique,were recruited into this study,which was a prospective,double-blind and randomized controlled trial.The participants were randomly allocated to either the experimental group(n=20)or the control group(n=20).They learned veneer preparation under different training course structures.For the experimental group,the step-by-step teaching method was used,of which the course was divided into four steps according to the procedures of veneer preparation:incisal preparation,facial preparation,interproximal expansion,and finishing and polishing.Every step consisted of the teacher's lecture,the teacher's demonstration,and the learner's practice.For the control group,the all-in-one teaching method was used,of which the course comprised three steps:the teacher's lecture,the teacher's demonstration,and the learner's practice.Every step was carried out independently in turn.Thereafter,the training outcome was evaluated by the learners and teachers.The quality of preparations was evaluated by two experts.Results For the outcomes of the step-by-step and the all-in-one teaching methods,the learners'assessments were(4.35±0.67)and(3.40±0.75),the teachers'assessments were(4.67±0.58)and(3.33±0.58),the quality of preparations assessed by the experts were(7.93±1.03)and(6.60±1.29),respectively.In terms of each evaluation index,there was a significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusions The step-by-step teaching method can improve the outcome of dental skill training of veneer preparation.The teachers and students had a higher preference for the step-by-step teaching method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3