审判中心内涵再讨论--基于理论、制度及实践视角  

A Reinterpretation of the Implications of Trial-centeredness in the Theoretical,Institutional and Practical Perspectives

作　　者：杨正万[1] YANG Zhengwan(Center for Studies of Legality and Development of Ethnic Minority Areas,Guizhou Minzu University,Guiyang 550025,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州民族大学法制与民族地区发展研究中心,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《云南民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第4期147-152,共6页Journal of Yunnan Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“审判中心主义的效力研究”(2016BFX071)阶段成果。

摘　　要：国内法学界对于审判中心这一范畴的理论阐释存在理论逻辑不清晰的缺陷,对审判中心内涵的理论阐释既不深入、也不系统,对于审判中心这一范畴的理论内涵的探讨陷入了方法论立场上的实用主义。审判中心在理论层面称为审判中心主义,主要指以居中裁判职能发挥作用为指引的反映刑事诉讼程序纵向结构和横向结构规律的程序结构思想。制度层面的审判中心称为以审判为中心,即保证庭审在查明事实、认定证据、保护诉权、公正裁判中发挥决定性作用。实践层面的审判中心称为庭审实质化,主要是保障判决基础来源于法庭。There exists a poor understanding of the theoretical logic and implications of trial-centeredness as a legal category by domestic legal circles, whose interpretation has often fallen into methodological utilitarianism. Trial-centeredness or trial-centeredness doctrine refers to the idea of the procedural structure longitudinally and transversely which aims at the neutral trial-function in the field of the criminal procedure law. Trial-centeredness at the institutional level aims at assuring that the court plays a decisive role in the fields of fact-investigation, evidence-ascertaining, protection of the right to lawsuit and fair-judgment. Trial-centeredness in practice aims at assuring the judicial sentencing based on the facts confirmed by the lawcourt.

关 键 词：审判中心 侦查中心 刑事诉讼结构 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]