检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王湃 刘爱书[2] 郝洋 朱丽娟 WANG Pai;LIU Aishu;HAO Yang;ZHU Lijuan(Department of Psychology,School of Education Science,Tonghua Normal University,Tonghua 134000,Jilin Province,China)
机构地区:[1]通化师范学院教育科学学院心理系,吉林134000 [2]哈尔滨师范大学教育科学学院心理系
出 处:《中国学校卫生》2020年第6期871-873,共3页Chinese Journal of School Health
基 金:吉林省教育厅“十三五”社会科学研究重点项目(JJKH20191100SK);吉林省高等教育学会高教科研重点课题(JGJX2019C46);吉林省青少年发展研究计划(2020jqy-037)。
摘 要:目的了解有儿童期忽视经历者的认知灵活性特点,为受忽视人群认知特点的研究及其干预提供理论依据和数据参考。方法使用《儿童忽视量表》对通化师范学院719名在校大学生进行问卷调查,并筛选出心理忽视阳性的被试28名,进行威斯康辛卡片分类测验(WCST)和言语流畅性测验(VFT),分别了解受忽视者的反应灵活性和自发灵活性。结果有忽视经历的被试比例为43.74%。男生、非独生子、农村地区学生忽视经历得分较高(P值均<0.05)。儿童期的忽视经历影响个体的反应灵活性(t=2.22,P<0.05)。儿童期的忽视经历影响个体的自发灵活性(t=-2.17,P<0.05)。结论儿童期忽视经历对个体的认知灵活性产生了不良影响。Objective To understand cognitive flexibility among college students with childhood neglected experience,and to provide a thoretical basis and data reference for the study of cognitive characteristics of neglected people and its intervention.Methods A total of 719 college students were surveyed using the Childhood Neglect Scale,and were screened through Childhood Neglect Scale. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test( WCST) and Verbal Fluency Test( VFT) were adminstered among those with childhood neglect to understand the responding flexibility and spontaneous flexibility. Results The proportion of subjects with neglect experience was 43.74%. Boys,non-only children,students in rural areas neglect experience were higher( P<0.05). The neglect experience of childhood affects the individual’s response flexibility( t = 2.22,P<0.05),as well as spontaneous flexibility( t =-2.17,P<0.05).Conclusion Childhood neglect experience has a negative impact on cognitive flexibility.
分 类 号:B842.1[哲学宗教—基础心理学] D432.7[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145