检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺志军 胡江涛 HE Zhijun;HU Jiangtao(Hunan Technology and Business University,Changsha Hunan 410025,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南工商大学廉政法治研究所,湖南长沙410025
出 处:《河南警察学院学报》2020年第3期76-83,共8页Journal of Henan Police College
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“互联网领域知识产权犯罪刑事治理研究”(16BFX054)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:《刑法修正案(八)》规定的“禁止令”和《刑法修正案(九)》规定的“从业禁止”,标志着刑事职业禁止作为一种预防再犯的措施被引入我国刑法典。现阶段我国在侵犯知识产权罪刑事治理中职业禁止适用率低且立法上存在一定的不周延性。我国有必要在刑法分则和知识产权法律规范中明确刑事职业禁止的规定,在比例原则和合宪性理念前提下,扩大适用范围至单位犯罪,构建复权制度,以促进我国对侵犯知识产权罪刑事治理水平的提升。The"prohibition order"stipulated in the Criminal Law Amendment VIII and the"occupation prohibition"stipulated in the Criminal Law Amendment IX mark that the criminal occupation prohibition,as a measure to prevent recidivism,is introduced into China’s criminal code.At present,the application rate of occupation prohibition in the intellectual property crime is still low and there is certain degree of indistribution in the legislation.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify the criminal occupation prohibition in specific provisions of criminal law and intellectual property legal regulations,to expand the scope of application to unit crimes under the principle of proportionality and constitutionality,and to establish a right recovery system,so as to enhance the criminal governance of intellectual property crime in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170