检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓亚东[1] 陈伟海[1] 罗书文[1] 孟庆鑫 史文强[1] 李乐乐 DENG Ya-dong;CHEN Wei-hai;LUO Shu-wen;MENG Qing-xin;SHI Wen-qiang;LI Le-le(Institute of Karst Geology,CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics,MNR&GZAR,Guilin Guangxi 541004,China)
机构地区:[1]中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所/自然资源部广西岩溶动力学重点实验室,广西桂林541004
出 处:《西南大学学报(自然科学版)》2020年第8期129-137,共9页Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学青年基金项目(41502257);中国地质科学院院长基金项目(YYWF201638);中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所所长基金项目(2017034);全国重要地质遗迹调查项目(DD20179313)。
摘 要:为探讨旅游洞穴景观脆弱性的概念、内涵与特征,构建了旅游洞穴景观脆弱性评价指标体系并进行脆弱性评价实证研究,在了解脆弱性研究相关成果的基础上,结合岩溶洞穴景观系统的特点,提出了旅游洞穴景观脆弱性概念,分析了旅游洞穴脆弱性的内涵与特征.并借鉴已开放洞穴的开发建设经验,构建了一个包括本体脆弱性、自然脆弱性、人为脆弱性3个方面15个具体指标的评价指标体系.运用AHP法与熵值法相结合的方法确定指标体系权重,采用线性加权模型对旅游洞穴景观脆弱度进行评价及等级划分.以石花水洞、水晶宫、芦笛岩、芙蓉洞、陶家台溶洞为例,对这5个旅游洞穴景观脆弱度进行评判,结果显示:芦笛岩为高度脆弱;石花水洞、芙蓉洞为中度脆弱;水晶宫、陶家台溶洞为低度脆弱.经实地验证,评价结果与芦笛岩、石花水洞、芙蓉洞、水晶宫、陶家台溶洞脆弱性的实际表现比较吻合.This paper aims at discussing the concept,connotations and characteristics of landscape vulnerability of tourist caves,constructing the evaluation indicator system for it,and conducting an empirical research on vulnerability evaluation.Firstly,on the basis of understanding relevant research results on vulnerability development,this paper puts forward the concept of landscape vulnerability of tourist caves and analyzes its connotations and characteristics in combination with the features of the karst cave landscape system.Next,drawing upon the experience in developing and constructing already opened caves,this paper constructs an evaluation indicator system consisting of 15 specific indicators in three aspects of ontological vulnerability,natural vulnerability and artificial vulnerability.Then,combining the AHP method with the entropy method,this paper determines the weight for the indicator system,and adopts the linear weighted model to evaluate and classify the grade of landscape vulnerability of tourist caves.Finally,taking the examples of Stone Flower Water Cave,Crystal Cave,Reed Flute Cave,Furong Cave,and Taojiatai Cave,this paper evaluates the landscape vulnerability of these tourist caves.The results show that Reed Flute Cave is highly vulnerable;Stone Flower Water Cave and Furong Cave are moderately vulnerable;and Crystal Cave and Taojiatai Cave are mildly vulnerable.A field reconnaissance verifies that the evaluation results are consistent with the actual vulnerability performance of these caves.
分 类 号:P964[天文地球—自然地理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.249.217