“庭审实质化”要求下的认罪认罚案件审理对象之确定  

The Determination of the Trial Object in Leniency Cases based on Admission of Guilt and Acceptance of Punishment under the Requirement of“Substantiation of Trial”

作　　者：王乐龙 Wang Lelong

机构地区：[1]聊城大学法学院,山东聊城252000

出　　处：《南海法学》2020年第1期66-74,共9页The South China Sea Law Journal

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划项目“审判中心主义视角下的刑事案件认罪认罚从宽制度研究”(18CSPJ18)。

摘　　要：“庭审实质化”是“以审判为中心”的诉讼制度改革的基本要求,目的是解决当前我国刑事审判“流于形式”的顽疾,充分发挥庭审在刑事诉讼中的关键作用。以刑事案件繁简难易进行区分,进而决定案件是否需要庭审实质化,是对“认罪认罚从宽制度”及“庭审实质化”内涵的双重误解。基于认罪认罚案件在审前程序已对犯罪事实及相关证据进行了确认,其审理对象已经转变为对被告人认罪认罚自愿性、真实性、合法性的“庭审验证”以及对检察机关量刑建议的“庭审甄别”。囿于认罪认罚案件一审审理对象的显著不同,其二审程序已失去了“全面审理原则”的适用基础,认罪认罚案件的二审应只围绕上诉或者抗诉的理由而展开。“:Substantiation of trial”is the basic requirement of the“trial center”reform,its purpose is to solve the problem of criminal trial formality and fully play the key role of trial in criminal proceedings.It is a double misun⁃derstanding of the connotation o“f leniency based on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment”and“substantia⁃tion of trial”to distinguish between complicated and simple criminal cases and then decide whether a case needs sub⁃stantiation of trial.Based on the confirmation of criminal facts and relevant evidence in the pre-trial procedure,the trial object has been changed into“trial verification”of the willing,authenticity and legality for the defendant’s admis⁃sion of guilt and acceptance of punishment,and“trial screening”of the sentencing suggestions of the procuratorate.Due to the obvious differences in the trial objects of the first instance,the second instance procedure has lost the applica⁃ble basis of the“comprehensive trial principle”.The second instance of the this kind of cases should only focus on the reasons of appeal or protest.

关 键 词：审判中心主义 庭审实质化 认罪认罚从宽 庭审验证 庭审甄别 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]