检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾宪坤 Xiankun Zeng(College of Philosophy and Social Development,Guizhou University)
机构地区:[1]贵州大学哲学与社会发展学院
出 处:《逻辑学研究》2020年第3期106-116,共11页Studies in Logic
摘 要:西方逻辑学传播和从日本输入因明后的直接影响是在民国时期出现佛教逻辑研究,最明显的表现是大多研究者形成因明的三支论式与亚里士多德三段论的一致性的观念,即新因明结构宗、因、喻分别对应三段论结论、小前提、大前提。吕澂则从历时性角度,站在法称量论理论框架下,研究因明的内容,认为因明等同于量论,包含论证结构及其规则、论证的认识论基础和论证在佛学中运用三部分内容,这就是佛家逻辑。吕澂的研究是因明创新研究的一个范例,是对窥基因明研究的一种逻辑转向,助益于当今佛教逻辑学科建设,但是,基于包含佛教逻辑在内的逻辑边界,吕澂并没有清晰的回答,使得在佛学论证中各持己说,这是吕澂给我们留下来研究的课题。Studies on Buddhist Logic during the period of the Republic of China have been strongly shaped by the Western logical theories and Japanese Hetuvidyā researches that were introduced into China at that time. Unlike most scholars who endorsed the idea that the threeform reasoning(三支论式) of Hetuvidyā can be identified with the Aristotelian syllogism, Lyu Cheng has argued that Hetuvidyā is indeed a particular kind of Buddhist Logic in the sense of the theory of Pramāna(量论), which includes studies on the structure and rules, the epistemological foundation and the applications of Buddhist Logic. Lyu Cheng’s work has set up a new research paradigm for the study of Hetuvidyā that is particularly focused on the logical perspective, and therefore ensured the later developments of Buddhist Logic studies as a discipline. However,since there remains to be a lack of clear conception of logic, Lyu Cheng’s research paradigm has left behind many important issues that are in need of further investigation.
关 键 词:佛教逻辑 因明研究 佛家逻辑 吕澂 认识论基础 三支论式 逻辑边界 窥基
分 类 号:B81-093.51[哲学宗教—逻辑学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.104.136